Family Practice Advance Access published online on June 21, 2006
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cml031
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Background. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in selected health care settings is underway in the UK despite insufficient evidence about the personal impact of screening. Objectives. To describe men and women's experiences of being screened for chlamydia as part of the Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) project, a population-based UK study of postal screening for chlamydia. Methods. We conducted in-depth interviews with 45 purposively sampled participants in the ClaSS project using a checklist of topics relating to their experiences of the screening process. Interviews were audio-tape recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the constant comparison method. Results. Four main themes emerged: initial discomfort with screening arising from an unease with sexual health issues; anxiety, especially after receiving a positive test result, due to the fear of informing sexual partners, the risk of infertility and the possibility of having other undetected infections; women's concern about being stigmatised for having been infected with chlamydia, which affected how they felt about themselves and how they thought others would perceive them; and recognising the need to balance the harms of screening with the benefits. Despite some reported adverse effects, no one regretted their decision to be screened. Conclusions. Public education and discussion of sexually transmitted infections should help to increase the acceptability of chlamydia screening and destigmatise a diagnosis of chlamydia. Those working in primary care settings are likely to become increasingly involved in chlamydia screening and so must be suitably trained to inform individuals of the potential adverse effects and to deal with their consequences.
Received September 14, 2005
Revised April 24, 2006
Accepted May 23, 2006
Article
Population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the UK: a qualitative study of the experiences of those screened
Nicola Mills 1 *,
Gavin Daker-White 1,
Anna Graham 2,
Rona Campbell 1,
and
For The Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) Group
2 Academic Unit of Primary Health Care, Department of Community Based Medicine, University of Bristol, BS8 1AU, UK
Nicola Mills, E-mail: nicola.mills{at}bristol.ac.uk
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K Lorimer, M E Reid, and G J Hart "It has to speak to people's everyday life...": qualitative study of men and women's willingness to participate in a non-medical approach to Chlamydia trachomatis screening Sex Transm Inf, June 1, 2009; 85(3): 201 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. J Adams, K. M E Turner, W J. Edmunds, T E Roberts, N Low, E. J Adams, W J. Edmunds, and K. M E Turner The cost effectiveness of opportunistic chlamydia screening in England Sex Transm Inf, July 1, 2007; 83(4): 267 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
E-letters:
Read all E-letters
- What about the screening process?
- Karen Lorimer
- Family Practice, 13 Nov 2006 [Full text]
- Authors' response
- Nicola Mills
- Family Practice, 13 Nov 2006 [Full text]