Family Practice Advance Access published online on July 13, 2006
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cml033
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of General Practice, Cardiff University, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Introduction. Few women seek help for urinary incontinence. Subsequently, there may be many women accessing primary care services who would benefit from treatment or advice. If high levels of unexpressed need are present in this population, a more proactive approach to continence management may be appropriate, but the feasibility of this depends on an accurate assessment of the level of unmet need in this population. Aim. To assess the prevalence of urinary incontinence in a female population attending primary care and the extent of treatment seeking in relation to level of need. Methods. A cross-sectional survey of urinary incontinence of adult women attending primary care practices in West Yorkshire, London, Glasgow and Leicestershire during a 10- or 15-day period. Results. Three thousand two hundred and seventy-three (54%) women responded. Twenty-one per cent reported stress urinary incontinence only, 3.5% reported urge incontinence only and 21% reported mixed stress and urge incontinence during the preceding month (9% had moderate or severe symptoms). Fifty-three per cent of these had not consulted a health care professional, which is equivalent to 1 in 20 of women in GP waiting rooms, most of whom have stress and urge incontinence (75%) or stress incontinence only (21%). Conclusions. Nearly half of female primary care attendees had experienced incontinence during the preceding month, but only a minority had sought help. Even amongst the nearly 1 in 10 women with moderate or severe incontinence only about half had sought help. There remains considerable health decrement due to urinary incontinence in those not receiving help in a population readily accessible to primary care services.
Received June 20, 2005
Accepted June 7, 2006
Article
The extent and severity of urinary incontinence amongst women in UK GP waiting rooms
Chris Shaw 1 *,
Roben Das Gupta 2,
Donald M. Bushnell 3,
R. Phil Assassa 4,
Paul Abrams 5,
Adrian Wagg 6,
Chris Mayne 7,
Chris Hardwick 8,
and
Mona Martin 3
2 Boehringer Ingelheim Limited, Berkshire, UK
3 Health Research Associates, Inc., Seattle, Washington, USA
4 Mid Yorkshire Hospitals, Yorkshire, UK
5 Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
6 Department of Geriatric Medicine, University College London Hospitals, UK
7 Leicester General Hospital, Leicestershire, UK
8 Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK
Chris Shaw, E-mail: ShawC{at}cf.ac.uk
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?