Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on October 18, 2006
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cml051
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/1/26    most recent
cml051v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siriwardena, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siriwardena, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Received February 7, 2005
Revised August 2, 2006
Accepted September 13, 2006

Article

Investigation of the effect of a countywide protected learning time scheme on prescribing rates of ramipril: interrupted time series study

A. N. Siriwardena 1 *, P. Fairchild 2, S. Gibson 3, T. Sach 4, and M. Dewey 5

1 School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln
2 The Surgery, 11 Church Street, Hibaldstow, Brigg DN209ED
3 Lincolnshire Prescribing Support Team, West Lincolnshire Primary Care Trust, Cross O'Cliff Court, Bracebridge Heath, Lincoln LN4 2HN
4 University of Nottingham, School of Community Health Sciences, 13th Floor Tower Building, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD
5 School of Community Health Sciences, B41 Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
A. N. Siriwardena, E-mail: nsiriwardena{at}lincoln.ac.uk


  Abstract

Background. Protected learning time (PLT) schemes have been set up in primary care across the UK. There is little published evidence of their effectiveness.

Objective. To investigate the effect of a PLT intervention for general practice to increase prescribing of ramipril for prevention of cardiovascular outcomes.

Design. Quasi-experimental, interrupted time series.

Setting. Lincolnshire, UK.

Methods. Prescribing data were analysed one year before and after the education for change in rate of increase of prescribing of ramipril, whether change in prescribing was related to postulated explanatory variables and to determine intervention costs.

Main outcome. The primary outcome was the rate of change of ramipril (10 mg) prescription items 12 months after compared with before the educational intervention. Secondary outcomes included cost.

Results. Ramipril prescribing at therapeutic dosage increased significantly (odds ratio 1.50, 95% CI 1.07-1.93) following education by 52 345 items (31 132 items at 10 mg) at a cost of £292k to £460k depending on formulation. This occurred despite a background of secular change. Most practices were represented by GPs, nurses or both during the education. Single-handed GPs were less likely to attend. Practices showed considerable variation in response to the educational intervention. The only predictor of whether practices increased in prescribing rate after the education was whether a practice nurse had undertaken specific diabetes training. Total list size, dispensing, training or single-handed status and GP attendance did not predict a change in prescribing.

Conclusion. PLT schemes can contribute to beneficial changes in prescribing across a large geographical area.

Keywords: Education; family practice; diabetes; prescribing; angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.