Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on November 30, 2006
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cml057
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/1/77    most recent
cml057v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, W.
Right arrow Articles by Britten, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, W.
Right arrow Articles by Britten, N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Received June 14, 2006
Revised October 2, 2006
Accepted October 17, 2006

Article

The effect of patient self-completion agenda forms on prescribing and adherence in general practice: a randomized controlled trial

William Hamilton 1 *, David Russell 2, Catherine Stabb 2, David Seamark 3, Charles Campion-Smith 4, and Nicky Britten 3

1 CAPER research practices, Halford Wing, Dean Clarke House, Southernhay, Exeter EX1 1PQ, UK; Academic Unit of Primary Health Care, Department of Community Based Medicine, University of Bristol, The Grange, 1 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1AU, UK
2 CAPER research practices, Halford Wing, Dean Clarke House, Southernhay, Exeter EX1 1PQ, UK
3 Institute of Health and Social Care Research, Peninsula Medical School, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK
4 Institute of Health and Community Studies, Bournemouth University, Royal London House, Christchurch Road, Bournemouth BH1 3LT, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
William Hamilton, E-mail: w.hamilton{at}bristol.ac.uk


  Abstract

Background. What the patient wants from a general practice consultation and what the doctor believes they want are not always the same thing. This mismatch may lead to unwanted and unnecessary prescribing.

Aim. To study the effect of a one-page form completed by patients before their consultation and given to the doctor at the start of the consultation, in terms of a reduction in prescribing, satisfaction with the consultation and adherence with prescribed medication.

Design. Randomized controlled trial.

Setting. Ten general practices in Devon and Dorset, UK.

Methods. Unselected patients attending general practice appointments were randomised to receive (or not) a self-completed agenda form (SCAF) asking five questions, including whether the patient considered they should receive a prescription.

Results. Approximately 4125 patients were offered entry; 3124 (76%) agreed to randomisation. In 1783 (57%) of these prescribing or satisfaction outcomes were identified. 457 of 811 (56.4%) of SCAF patients received a prescription, at a median (IQR) cost of £5.60 (inter-quartile range £2.12-£16.10), compared with 418 of 799 (52.3%) of controls, at a median cost of £5.94 (£2.46-£18.90); both results non-significant (P = 0.10 for prescribing and 0.30 for cost). Satisfaction was also similar in both groups: mean satisfaction score in SCAFs 5.37 and in controls 5.40 (P = 0.64), as was adherence: at 12 weeks, adherence of 75% or greater was reported by 92 of 136 SCAF patients (68%) and 105 of 145 controls (72%) (P = 0.31).

Conclusion. The negative result could have two explanations. Either the intervention did not achieve the intention of communicating the patients' agendas, or if it did, patients may have been persuaded by doctors' explanations in the consultation.

Keywords: Adherence; prescribing; primary health care; randomised controlled trial.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.