Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on May 9, 2007

Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmm014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/3/245    most recent
cmm014v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gulliford, M. C
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gulliford, M. C
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Continuity of care and intermediate outcomes of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Martin C Gulliford, Smriti Naithani and Myfanwy Morgan

Division of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, London, UK. Correspondence to: Martin Gulliford, Department of Public Health Sciences, King's College London, Capital House, 42 Weston Street, London SE1 3QD, UK; Email: martin.gulliford@kcl.ac.uk

Received 13 October 2006; Revised 18 January 2007; Accepted 18 March 2007.


   Abstract

Background. The relevance of continuity of care in chronic illness is uncertain.

Objective. We evaluated whether experienced continuity of care for type 2 diabetes is associated with HbA1c, blood pressure or body weight.

Methods. Cohort study in 19 family practices in London, UK. Participants were 209 type 2 diabetic patients with 156 (75%) followed-up at 10 months. Main measures were experienced continuity of care (ECC) by patient questionnaire (mean score 62.1, SD 16.0), satisfaction with care, health-related quality of life [short-form 12 (SF-12)], HbA1c, blood pressure and body weight. Analyses were adjusted for baseline values, age, sex, ethnicity, duration of diabetes, diabetes treatment, education, housing tenure and whether living alone.

Results. Experienced continuity scores were obtained for 193 (92%) of participants at baseline and 156 (75%) at follow-up with no difference in outcome measures between those followed-up and those not. Subjects with the highest satisfaction ratings, compared with the lowest, had higher experienced continuity (difference in experienced continuity 7.87, 95% confidence interval 3.22–12.5, P = 0.001). ECC was not associated with HbA1c (adjusted difference per 10-unit increase in ECC score, –0.09%, –0.29 to 0.12%, P = 0.402), systolic blood pressure (–0.41, –2.88 to 2.06 mm Hg, P = 0.746), body mass index (–0.08, –0.34 to 0.18 kg/m2, P = 0.562) or SF-12 physical component score (0.73, –0.88 to 2.35, P = 0.375).

Conclusion. Experienced continuity of diabetes care is associated with greater patient satisfaction but not with improved intermediate outcomes during 10 months follow-up in this setting. Studies with more subjects will be required to determine whether continuity of care is associated with the frequency of adverse events.

Keywords. Continuity of care, diabetes mellitus, patient experience, patient views, quality of care.


Gulliford MC, Naithani S and Morgan M. Continuity of care and intermediate outcomes of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Family Practice 2007; Pages 1–7 of 7.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J. Szecsenyi, T. Rosemann, S. Joos, F. Peters-Klimm, and A. Miksch
German Diabetes Disease Management Programs Are Appropriate for Restructuring Care According to the Chronic Care Model: An evaluation with the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2008; 31(6): 1150 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.