Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on June 24, 2007

Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmm020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/4/323    most recent
cmm020v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Reeves, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Reeves, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

The association between culture, climate and quality of care in primary health care teams

Mark Hanna, Peter Bowera, Stephen Campbella, Martin Marshallb and David Reevesa

a National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, 5th Floor - Williamson Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL
b Department of Health, Richmond House, 79 Whitehall, London SW1A 2NS, UK. Correspondence to Peter Bower

Email: peter.bower{at}manchester.ac.uk

Received 10 May 2006; Revised 4 April 2007; Accepted 24 April 2007.


   Abstract

Background. Culture and climate represent shared beliefs and values that may influence quality of care in health care teams, and which could be manipulated for quality improvement. However, there is a lack of agreement on the theoretical and empirical relationships between climate and culture, and their relative power as predictors of quality of care. This study sought to examine the association between self-report measures of climate and culture in primary care teams and comprehensive measures of quality of care.

Methods. The data were derived from a cross-sectional survey of 492 professionals in 42 general practices in England. Self-report measures of culture (the Competing Values Framework) and climate (the Team Climate Inventory) were used, together with validated measures of quality of care from medical records and self-report.

Results. The majority of practices could be characterized as ‘clan’ culture type. Practices with a dominant clan culture scored higher on climate for participation and teamwork. There were no associations between culture and quality of care, and only limited evidence of associations between climate and quality.

Conclusions. The current analysis would not support the hypothesis that culture and climate are important predictors of quality of care in primary care. Although larger studies are required to provide a definitive test, the results may suggest the need for a more complex model of the associations between culture, climate and outcomes, and further research may be required into the interaction between culture and climate with other determinants of behaviour such as internal and external incentives.

Keywords. Culture, team climate, quality of care, health care teams, quality improvement.


Hann M, Bower P, Campbell S, Marshall M and Reeves D. The association between culture, climate and quality of care in primary health care teams. Family Practice 2007; Pages 1–7 of 7.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.