Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on September 7, 2007
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmm046
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/6/616    most recent
cmm046v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Hout, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Stalman, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Hout, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Stalman, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Diagnosing dementia with confidence by GPs

Hein PJ van Houta, Myrra J Vernooij-Dassenb and Wim AB Stalmana

a Department of General Practice, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO), VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
b Center for Quality of Care Research (WOK), University Medical Center St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Correspondence to Hein van Hout, Department of General Practice, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO), VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7 1081 BS Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Email: hpj.vanhout{at}vumc.nl

Received 7 March 2007; Accepted 4 July 2007.


  Abstract

Background. Earlier reports suggest limited clinical reasoning and substantial uncertainty of GPs in assessing patients suspected of dementia.

Objective. To explore the predictors of GPs to decide on the presence and absence of dementia as well as the predictors of diagnostic confidence of GPs.

Design. An observational study was set up among 107 patients of 64 GPs. The GPs were instructed to use the Dutch national dementia guideline on consecutive patients newly suspected of dementia and to register their assessment on a detailed form. The predictors of the presence and absence of dementia according to the GPs and their diagnostic confidence were explored by logistic regression analyses.

Main outcome measures. Dependent variables: (i) presence and absence of dementia according to GPs and (ii) diagnostic confidence.

Independent variables: clinical (cognitive, behavioural, somatic, functional), applications of recommendations, patient related and GP related.

Results. Dementia was diagnosed in 67% of the suspected patients. The presence of dementia according to the GPs was positively associated with observed impairment of the higher cognitive functions, absence of depression and female gender of patients. The GPs expressed diagnostic confidence in 58% of the cases. This was positively associated with application of recommendations, ADL dependency, longer duration, informant availability, restless behaviour and a patient's female gender. Use of the Mini Mental Status Examination was not associated with confidence.

Conclusions. GPs seem to base the diagnosis of dementia on rational grounds. Application of the dementia guideline's recommendations may contribute to more diagnostic confidence.

Keywords. Clinical diagnosis, decision science, dementia, diagnostic tests, family medicine.

van Hout HPJ, Vernooij-Dassen MJ and Stalman WAB. Diagnosing dementia with confidence by GPs. Family Practice 2007; Pages 1–6 of 6.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.