Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on February 27, 2008

Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn010
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/2/119    most recent
cmn010v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ried, K.
Right arrow Articles by Farmer, E. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ried, K.
Right arrow Articles by Farmer, E. A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

General practice research training: impact of the Australian Registrar Research Workshop on research skills, confidence, interest and involvement of participants, 2002–2006

Karin Rieda, Brett D Montgomeryb, Nigel P Stocksa and Elizabeth A Farmerc

a Discipline of General Practice, The University of Adelaide, South Australia
b Department of General Practice, University of Western Australia, Western Australia
c Graduate School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia. Email: karin.ried@adelaide.edu.au

Received 3 July 2007; Revised 18 January 2008; Accepted 24 January 2008.


   Abstract

Background. An intensive 3-day training programme, the ‘Registrar Research Workshop’ (RRW), has aimed to build research capacity among Australian general practice registrars since 1994.

Objectives. To investigate the impact of the RRW on participants' skills, confidence, interest in research and research activity.

Methods. Cross-sectional postal survey in 2006 of five groups of registrars who participated in the annual workshop in 2002–2006 (response rate: 64%; 77 of 121). Outcome measures included research experience and skills prior to and after the workshop; impact of the workshop on capacity, confidence, attitude and interest in research; and research involvement as measured by publications and grant funding.

Results. Self-reported research skills increased over time for the whole group (two-way analysis of variance: P = 0.047), most significantly for registrars with little or no research experience (P < 0.001) and research project participants (P = 0.003). The impact of the workshop on capacity, confidence and interest in research was rated highly (mean 3.5–4.0 ± 0.1 on a five-point scale). Two-thirds of the survey respondents had been research active, 34% presented their findings at conferences, 25% published in peer-reviewed journals and 31% received research funding. Eighty-four per cent of respondents indicated a high interest in undertaking research in the future. All survey respondents recommended the workshop to other registrars.

Conclusions. The RRW provides a useful model for effective research training for interested general practice trainees. Such training has the potential to increase knowledge of research methods, which might augment future research activity in general practice.

Keywords. Academic training, family practice, medical education, research activity, training programme.


Ried K, Montgomery BD, Stocks NP and Farmer EA. General practice research training: impact of the Australian Registrar Research Workshop on research skills, confidence, interest and involvement of participants, 2002–2006. Family Practice 2008; Pages 1–8 of 8.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
J. Graffy
Engaging family practitioners in research: are we getting it right?
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2008; 25(2): 69 - 70.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.