Family Practice Advance Access published online on October 3, 2008
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn066
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The concept of sustainability and the use of outcome indicators. A case study to continue a successful health counselling intervention
a Department of Academic Collaboration for Public Health Limburg, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University
b Department of Health Education and Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht
c Department of Health Promotion, Public Health Service South Limburg, Geleen
d Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Maastricht University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Correspondence to Maria Jansen, Public Health Service South Limburg Management, PO Box 2022, Geleen 6160, The Netherlands; Email: maria.jansen{at}ggdzl.nl
Received 22 May 2008; Revised 28 August 2008; Accepted 29 August 2008.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Background. To ensure the continuation of a successful pilot programme, the change process and the concept of sustainability need to be elaborated. So far, there are different theories on organizational change and sustainability but its practical application stay far behind.
Objectives. To test the practical application of a theory-based concept of sustainability and to assess the role of the change agent. A health counselling programme for high-risk cardiovascular patients, called Heartbeat 2, was used as a case study.
Methods. Outcome indicators were assessed based on the questions: Why should health counselling be sustained? How should this be done and by whom? How much needs to occur and by when? Data were derived from registrations, reports and focus group interviews.
Results. The results indicate a need for a linkage system in the final stages of change so that the programme is maintained. Limitations of the external change agent are described. The outcome indicators appeared to be an adequate operationalization to monitor sustainability. The change process leading up to sustainability appeared to be highly complex due to unpredictable and unforeseen external factors.
Conclusions. Our concept of sustainability appeared to be an adequate tool for the change agent to assess the extent of sustainability. An external change agent has limited influence on the management’s decision-making processes during the sustainability stage. As long as the context is changing, definite choices to sustain the innovative service of health counselling in hospitals will not be made, which inherently means an ongoing change process to sustainability.
Keywords. Capacity planning, change agent, institutionalization, organizational development, sustainability.
Jansen M, Harting J, Ebben N, Kroon B, Stappers J, Van Engelshoven E and de Vries N. The concept of sustainability and the use of outcome indicators. A case study to continue a successful health counselling intervention. Family Practice 2008; Pages 6: 1–6.