Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on December 12, 2008

Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn095
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/1/10    most recent
cmn095v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Falk, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fahey, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Falk, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fahey, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

C-reactive protein and community-acquired pneumonia in ambulatory care: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies

Gavin Falk and Tom Fahey

Division of Population Health Sciences, Department of General Practice, RCSI Medical School, Beaux Lane House, Mercer Street, Dublin 2, Ireland

Correspondence to Tom Fahey, Division of Population Health Sciences, Department of General Practice, RCSI Medical School, Beaux Lane House, Mercer Street, Dublin 2, Ireland; Email: tomfahey{at}rcsi.ie

Received 8 May 2008; Revised 10 October 2008; Accepted 11 November 2008.


   Abstract

Background. There is uncertainty regarding the diagnostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in community or ambulatory settings.

Objective. We assessed the diagnostic value of CRP in primary care and accident and emergency departments in terms of ruling in or ruling out CAP.

Methods. Diagnostic accuracy systematic review, we searched PubMed from January 1966 to September 2008 and EMBASE from January 1980 to September 2008 using a diagnostic accuracy search filter. We included cross-sectional or cohort studies that assess the diagnostic utility of CRP at different cut-points against a reference standard of chest X-ray. We calculated pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) and assessed heterogeneity using the I2 index.

Results. Eight studies incorporating 2194 patients were included. The median prevalence of CAP was 14.6% (range 5%–89%). At a CRP cut-point of ≤20 mg/l, the pooled positive LR+ was 2.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8–2.4] and the pooled negative LR– was 0.33 (95% CI 0.25–0.43). At the two other CRP cut-points (≤50, >100 mg/l), the results were heterogeneous, so the pooled results should be interpreted with caution.

Conclusions. CRP may be of value in ruling out a diagnosis of CAP in situations where the probability of CAP >10%, typically accident and emergency departments. In primary care, additional diagnostic testing with CRP is unlikely to alter the probability of CAP sufficiently to change subsequent management decisions such as antibiotic prescribing or referral to hospital.

Keywords. Ambulatory care, C-reactive protein, diagnosis, pneumonia.


Falk G and Fahey T. C-reactive protein and community-acquired pneumonia in ambulatory care: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies. Family Practice 2008; Pages 1–11 of 11.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
A. D Hay and K. V Juttner
Antibiotics for acute cough in primary care
BMJ, May 5, 2009; 338(may05_1): b834 - b834.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.